ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

ナレッジ・トゥ・アクション・フレームワーク(KTA)×エビデンスに基づく実践態度尺度(EBPAS-36)×
分野実装科学実装科学
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年20042005
提唱者Ian D. Graham, PhD; Roberta L. Logan, MD, MSc; colleagues at Ottawa Hospital Research InstituteGregory A. Aarons, PhD
種類Conceptual framework and process modelSelf-report questionnaire
原典Graham, I. D., & Logan, R. L. (2004). Translating research into practice: A perspective on technology transfer. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 11(2), 141–145. link ↗Aarons, G. A. (2011). Evidence-Based Practice Attitude Scale-50 (EBPAS-50) and EBPAS-36 short form: Psychometric properties. Implementation Science, 6(1), 89. link ↗
別名KTA, Knowledge-to-Action, KTA Framework, Knowledge-to-Action CycleEBPAS, EBPAS-36, Evidence-Based Practice Attitude
関連55
概要The Knowledge-to-Action (KTA) Framework is a conceptual model and process guide for translating evidence into practice, developed by Ian Graham and colleagues at the Ottawa Hospital Research Institute (2004–2006). The KTA framework addresses a central challenge in implementation science: research evidence alone does not change practice; a deliberate, systematic process is required to adapt evidence to local contexts, identify and overcome implementation barriers, and sustain change. The KTA distinguishes between knowledge production (research, evidence synthesis) and knowledge application (implementation planning, barrier identification, strategy selection, execution, monitoring, and adaptation). The framework has become one of the most widely adopted implementation models in healthcare, particularly in Canada and internationally, and provides a structured approach to evidence-based practice implementation that is context-sensitive and iterative.The EBPAS-36 is a 36-item self-report questionnaire that assesses clinicians' and organizational leaders' attitudes toward adopting and implementing evidence-based practices (EBP). Developed by Aarons in 2005 and refined through multiple validation studies, it measures four core dimensions: perceived requirements to adopt EBP, the appeal and usefulness of EBP to individual practice, organizational openness to innovation, and perceived divergence between current practice and EBP requirements. The EBPAS is widely used in healthcare, mental health, child welfare, and substance abuse treatment settings to predict adoption readiness and guide implementation planning.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: KTA · EBPAS-36. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare