ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Keyness Analysis×批判的談話分析×
分野言語学質的手法
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1997Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
提唱者Mike ScottNorman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
種類Corpus comparison of relative word frequenciesQualitative research method
原典Scott, M. (1997). PC analysis of key words — and key key words. System, 25(2), 233–245. DOI ↗Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗
別名Keyword Analysis, Corpus Keyness, Keyness StatisticsCDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
関連36
概要Keyness analysis identifies the words that are characteristically frequent (or infrequent) in a target corpus relative to a reference corpus, using statistical tests to measure how unexpected each word's frequency is. Introduced by Mike Scott in 1997, it answers the question 'what is this text or collection distinctively about?' and is a central technique in corpus linguistics and corpus-assisted discourse analysis for surfacing the salient vocabulary of a genre, period, author, or social group.Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Keyness Analysis · Critical Discourse Analysis. 2026-06-24に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare