ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

k核分解×コミュニティ検出×
分野ネットワーク分析ネットワーク分析
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19832002–2019 (algorithm family)
提唱者Stephen B. SeidmanLouvain: Blondel et al. (2008); Leiden: Traag et al. (2019); Girvan-Newman: Girvan & Newman (2002); Infomap: Rosvall & Bergstrom (2008)
種類Graph pruning and hierarchical decompositionGraph-partitioning / clustering algorithm family
原典Seidman, S. B. (1983). Network structure and minimum degree. Social Networks, 5(3), 269–287. DOI ↗Blondel, V.D., Guillaume, J.-L., Lambiotte, R. & Lefebvre, E. (2008). Fast Unfolding of Communities in Large Networks. Journal of Statistical Mechanics, 2008(10), P10008. DOI ↗
別名Core Decomposition, Coreness Decomposition, Shell Decomposition, Çekirdek Ayrıştırmagraph clustering, network partitioning, Topluluk Tespiti (Louvain, Girvan-Newman, Leiden)
関連35
概要k-Core Decomposition is a graph-theoretic method that partitions the vertices of a network into a nested sequence of subgraphs called k-cores. A k-core is the maximal subgraph in which every vertex has at least k neighbors within that subgraph. Introduced by Stephen B. Seidman in 1983, the method assigns each vertex a coreness number that captures its structural centrality relative to the local connectivity of the graph.Community detection is a family of graph-partitioning algorithms that discover densely connected sub-groups — communities — within a network. First formalised through the modularity measure by Girvan and Newman (2002), the field advanced rapidly with the Louvain method (Blondel et al., 2008), the Leiden refinement (Traag et al., 2019), and the information-theoretic Infomap approach. All variants answer the same question: which nodes cluster together more tightly among themselves than with the rest of the network?
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: k-Core Decomposition · Community Detection. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare