ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Intertextuality Analysis×Form Criticism×
分野Religious StudiesReligious Studies
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19891921
提唱者Richard B. Hays (echoes/allusion criteria); building on Julia Kristeva's intertextualityHermann Gunkel (Old Testament); Rudolf Bultmann & Martin Dibelius (New Testament)
種類Criteria-based pipeline for detecting and interpreting scriptural allusions and echoesGenre-classification and tradition-history pipeline for oral pre-literary units
原典Hays, R. B. (1989). Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul. New Haven: Yale University Press. ISBN: 9780300044713Bultmann, R. (1963). The History of the Synoptic Tradition (trans. J. Marsh). New York: Harper & Row. [German original 1921]. ISBN: 9780060611729
別名Inner-Biblical Allusion Analysis, Echoes of Scripture, Allusion and Echo Criticism, Scriptural IntertextualityFormgeschichte, Form-Critical Analysis, Genre Criticism of Scripture, Tradition History
関連44
概要Intertextuality analysis studies how one text invokes another, and in biblical studies it focuses on the dense web of allusion and echo by which later scripture reuses earlier scripture. When Paul quotes, paraphrases, or faintly echoes Israel's scriptures, the borrowed words carry their old context into the new, enriching and sometimes reshaping the meaning. Richard B. Hays's 1989 Echoes of Scripture in the Letters of Paul made this study rigorous by proposing a set of criteria for deciding when an apparent echo is real and what it does. Drawing the term intertextuality from literary theory but giving it a controlled, text-critical application, Hays distinguished quotation, allusion, and the faintest echo, and showed how an evoked source text can transform a passage through the figure of metalepsis. The method gives disciplined criteria for a notoriously slippery interpretive judgment.Form criticism (Formgeschichte) studies the small, originally oral units that make up the biblical text, asking what genre each unit belongs to, what social setting gave rise to it, and how it developed before reaching written form. Hermann Gunkel pioneered the approach for the Hebrew Bible, treating the narratives of Genesis and the Psalms as folk forms shaped by communal use, while Rudolf Bultmann and Martin Dibelius applied it to the Gospels, analyzing the sayings and stories about Jesus as units that circulated and were shaped by the early church before the evangelists wrote. Bultmann's 1921 History of the Synoptic Tradition is the method's most systematic statement. The core conviction is that form and function are linked: a unit's genre points to the recurring life-setting, the Sitz im Leben, in which the community used it.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Intertextuality Analysis · Form Criticism. 2026-06-24に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare