ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Intersectionality Analysis×Thematic Analysis×
分野Gender Studies質的研究
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19892006
提唱者Kimberlé CrenshawVirginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
種類Critical qualitative analytic frameworkMethod
原典Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. DOI ↗Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
別名Intersectional Analysis, Intersectionality Framework, Intersectional Qualitative AnalysisTA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
関連43
概要Intersectionality analysis is a critical qualitative framework that examines how multiple social categories — such as race, gender, class, sexuality, and disability — intersect and operate together to shape lived experience, advantage, and disadvantage. Coined by legal scholar Kimberlé Crenshaw in 1989 and 1991, it rejects single-axis analysis that treats categories one at a time, insisting instead that overlapping systems of power produce qualitatively distinct positions that cannot be understood by adding the categories separately.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Intersectionality Analysis · Thematic Analysis. 2026-06-24に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare