手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 解釈的記号論分析× | 解釈的隠喩分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 質的手法 | 質的手法 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1960s–1990s | 1980 (conceptual foundations); 2000s (systematic qualitative procedure) |
| 提唱者≠ | Ferdinand de Saussure (foundational semiology); Roland Barthes (cultural/media application); Gunther Kress & Theo van Leeuwen (social semiotics) | Rudolf Schmitt (systematic procedure); grounded in Lakoff & Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory |
| 種類 | Qualitative interpretive analysis | Qualitative interpretive analysis |
| 原典≠ | Barthes, R. (1967). Elements of Semiology. Hill and Wang. ISBN: 978-0809013753 | Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226468013 |
| 別名 | semiotic discourse analysis, interpretive semiotics, social semiotics analysis, ISA | IMA, hermeneutic metaphor analysis, qualitative metaphor analysis, interpretive conceptual metaphor analysis |
| 関連 | 6 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | Interpretive semiotic analysis is a qualitative method that examines how signs — words, images, symbols, gestures, and sounds — produce meaning within specific social and cultural contexts. Drawing on Saussurean semiology and Barthesian cultural analysis, the approach moves beyond surface-level description to uncover the layered, context-bound meanings that sign systems generate. It is widely used in media studies, communication, education, marketing, and cultural research to reveal how representations shape social reality. | Interpretive metaphor analysis is a qualitative method that systematically identifies and interprets the conceptual metaphors embedded in participants' language to understand how they make meaning of their experiences. Rooted in Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory and adapted for empirical social research by Rudolf Schmitt, it applies a hermeneutic lens to treat metaphors not as stylistic ornaments but as windows into underlying cognitive and cultural frames. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|