手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 解釈的質的コンテンツ分析× | Grounded Theory× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野≠ | 質的手法 | 質的研究 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 2005 (interpretive strand formalised); qualitative content analysis roots in the 1980s–1990s | 1967 |
| 提唱者≠ | Hsiu-Fang Hsieh & Sarah E. Shannon (conventional/interpretive strand); Phillip Mayring (qualitative content analysis generally) | Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative analytic approach | Method |
| 原典≠ | Hsieh, H.-F., & Shannon, S. E. (2005). Three approaches to qualitative content analysis. Qualitative Health Research, 15(9), 1277–1288. DOI ↗ | Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory: Strategies for qualitative research. Aldine. link ↗ |
| 別名≠ | conventional content analysis, inductive qualitative content analysis, interpretive QCA, IQCA | GT, Grounded Theory Approach |
| 関連≠ | 5 | 3 |
| 概要≠ | Interpretive qualitative content analysis (also called conventional content analysis) is a qualitative approach to systematically analysing text in which coding categories emerge directly from the data rather than from a pre-defined coding scheme. The researcher immerses themselves in the material, derives codes inductively through close reading, groups those codes into interpretive categories, and constructs a conceptual account of the content's meaning. It is especially suited to domains where existing theory is sparse and the aim is to understand how participants describe or make sense of a phenomenon. | Grounded Theory (GT) is a systematic qualitative research methodology in which theory emerges directly from data through iterative analysis, rather than being imposed before data collection. Developed by Barney Glaser and Anselm Strauss in 1967, GT prioritizes generating explanatory frameworks grounded in evidence. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|