手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| Interpretive Grounded Theory× | 構成主義的グラウンデッド・セオリー× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 質的手法 | 質的手法 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1967 (foundational); interpretivist articulation ~2000–2006 | 2000s (Charmaz 2000–2006; classic GT roots 1967) |
| 提唱者≠ | Kathy Charmaz (interpretivist/constructivist strand); foundational grounded theory by Glaser & Strauss | Kathy Charmaz (building on Glaser & Strauss, 1967) |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative research methodology | Qualitative research method |
| 原典 | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539 | Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing Grounded Theory: A Practical Guide Through Qualitative Analysis. Sage. ISBN: 978-0761973539 |
| 別名 | interpretivist grounded theory, constructivist grounded theory, IGT, grounded theory — interpretivist strand | CGT, constructivist GT, Charmaz grounded theory, interpretive grounded theory |
| 関連 | 6 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | Interpretive grounded theory is a qualitative methodology that builds substantive theory inductively from data while working from an interpretivist epistemological stance. Developed most fully by Kathy Charmaz, it holds that researcher and participant co-construct meaning, that categories are created rather than discovered, and that the resulting theory is one plausible account among others rather than an objective rendering of social reality. | Constructivist Grounded Theory (CGT) is a qualitative methodology developed by Kathy Charmaz that systematically builds mid-range theory from empirical data through iterative coding, memo-writing, and theoretical sampling. Unlike the original objectivist version by Glaser and Strauss, CGT treats both data and theory as co-constructed between researcher and participants, acknowledging the researcher's interpretive perspective as an integral part of the analytic process rather than a source of bias to be eliminated. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|