手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 解釈的文書分析× | ナラティブ・インクワイアリー× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野≠ | 質的手法 | 質的研究 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 2000s (building on hermeneutic traditions from the 20th century) | 2000 |
| 提唱者≠ | Glenn Bowen (systematic method); Lindsay Prior (social use of documents) | D. Jean Clandinin and F. Michael Connelly |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative document-based research method | Method |
| 原典≠ | Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40. DOI ↗ | Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass. link ↗ |
| 別名≠ | interpretive documentary analysis, hermeneutic document analysis, qualitative document analysis, interpretive textual analysis | Narrative Analysis, Narrative Research, Life Story Method |
| 関連≠ | 6 | 3 |
| 概要≠ | Interpretive document analysis is a qualitative method that systematically examines written, visual, or digital documents to construct meaning from them within their social, historical, and institutional contexts. Rather than simply counting content categories, it reads documents as social artefacts — asking not only what a document says, but what it does, who produced it, for what purpose, and what assumptions it encodes. The approach draws on hermeneutic and interpretive traditions to move between individual passages and the broader context in which they were created. | Narrative inquiry is a qualitative research methodology that treats stories and life narratives as primary data, analyzing how individuals construct meaning and identity through storytelling. Developed by D. Jean Clandinin and F. Michael Connelly (2000), narrative inquiry examines the narratives people tell about their lives, experiences, and transitions, understanding that people make sense of experience through narrative. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|