手法を比較

	解釈的文書分析	解釈的テーマ分析
分野	質的手法	質的手法
系統	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
提唱年	2000s (building on hermeneutic traditions from the 20th century)	2006 (systematic formulation); interpretivist application developed through 2010s
提唱者	Glenn Bowen (systematic method); Lindsay Prior (social use of documents)	Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (systematic method); interpretivist orientation traced to constructivist qualitative traditions
種類	Qualitative document-based research method	Qualitative data analysis method
原典	Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative Research Journal, 9(2), 27–40.	Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
別名	interpretive documentary analysis, hermeneutic document analysis, qualitative document analysis, interpretive textual analysis	ITA, interpretive TA, interpretivist thematic analysis, constructivist thematic analysis
関連	6	6
概要	Interpretive document analysis is a qualitative method that systematically examines written, visual, or digital documents to construct meaning from them within their social, historical, and institutional contexts. Rather than simply counting content categories, it reads documents as social artefacts — asking not only what a document says, but what it does, who produced it, for what purpose, and what assumptions it encodes. The approach draws on hermeneutic and interpretive traditions to move between individual passages and the broader context in which they were created.	Interpretive thematic analysis is a form of thematic analysis conducted from an interpretivist or constructivist epistemological standpoint. Rather than treating themes as residing in the data waiting to be discovered, the researcher actively constructs meaning through their engagement with the data. Built on Braun and Clarke's systematic framework, the interpretive variant foregrounds the researcher's theoretical lens and reflexivity, producing analysis that goes beyond description to explain how social, cultural, or contextual forces shape participants' accounts.