手法を比較

	Interpretive Critical Discourse Analysis	Thematic Analysis
分野	質的手法	質的研究
系統	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
提唱年	1990s–2000s	2006
提唱者	Norman Fairclough; Ruth Wodak; Teun A. van Dijk (interpretive framing developed through constructivist qualitative traditions)	Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
種類	Qualitative discourse analysis design	Method
原典	Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. ISBN: 978-0745612126	Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
別名	interpretive CDA, constructivist critical discourse analysis, meaning-centred CDA, CDA-interpretivist	TA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
関連	6	3
概要	Interpretive critical discourse analysis (interpretive CDA) combines the power-and-ideology lens of critical discourse analysis with an interpretivist epistemology that foregrounds meaning-making, context, and the researcher's own positionality. It examines how language constructs social reality, legitimises or challenges power relations, and circulates ideological assumptions — while acknowledging that both the texts under study and the analyst's reading of them are socially situated and context-dependent.	Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.