ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Interpretive Conversation Analysis×批判的談話分析×
分野質的手法質的手法
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1960s–1970s (CA); interpretive strand formalised 1990s–2000sLate 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
提唱者Harvey Sacks, Emanuel Schegloff, Gail Jefferson (CA foundations); interpretive extension by discourse scholars including Margaret WetherellNorman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
種類Qualitative discourse research designQualitative research method
原典ten Have, P. (2007). Doing Conversation Analysis: A Practical Guide (2nd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1412922271Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗
別名ICA, interpretive CA, hermeneutic conversation analysis, qualitative conversation analysisCDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
関連66
概要Interpretive conversation analysis (ICA) examines how meaning is co-constructed turn by turn in talk, combining the micro-sequential rigour of classic conversation analysis with an explicitly interpretive stance. Rather than treating sequential organisation as the sole analytic object, ICA asks what participants are doing socially and discursively through their turns — what identities, institutional agendas, and power relations are built and contested in interaction. It draws on naturally occurring or recorded talk from social, institutional, or interview settings.Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Interpretive conversation analysis · Critical Discourse Analysis. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare