ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Interpretive Autoethnography×反射的テーマティック・アナリシス×
分野質的手法質的手法
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1990s–2000s2006 (seminal paper); explicitly named 'reflexive' from ~2019
提唱者Carolyn Ellis, Arthur Bochner (evocative strand); Leon Anderson (analytic/interpretive strand)Virginia Braun & Victoria Clarke
種類Qualitative self-study designQualitative research method
原典Ellis, C., Adams, T. E., & Bochner, A. P. (2011). Autoethnography: An overview. Forum: Qualitative Social Research, 12(1), Art. 10. link ↗Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
別名interpretive autoethnography, evocative autoethnography, analytic autoethnography, IAERTA, reflexive TA, Braun and Clarke thematic analysis, qualitative thematic analysis
関連66
概要Interpretive autoethnography is a qualitative research design in which the researcher uses systematic analysis of their own lived experience as the primary data source, moving beyond evocative personal narrative to connect personal meaning with broader cultural, social, or theoretical frameworks. Drawing on Leon Anderson's analytic strand and building on Ellis and Bochner's foundational work, it treats the researcher's self-account as both evidence and interpretive lens, subjecting personal stories to disciplined ethnographic and theoretical scrutiny to generate insights that extend beyond the individual case.Reflexive Thematic Analysis (RTA) is a widely used qualitative method for identifying, analysing, and interpreting patterns of shared meaning — called themes — across a dataset. Developed by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke, it is theoretically flexible, works across epistemological positions, and foregrounds the researcher's active, interpretive role rather than treating themes as features that simply emerge from data. It differs from older 'codebook' approaches by treating the analyst's subjectivity as a resource rather than a source of bias to be suppressed.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Interpretive autoethnography · Reflexive Thematic Analysis. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare