ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

集団間接触尺度×民主的価値尺度(Democratic Values Scale)×
分野政治社会学政治社会学
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1954–20081999–2015
提唱者Gordon Allport, Thomas Pettigrew, Linda TroppRussell Dalton, Hans-Dieter Klingemann, Christian Welzel
種類Self-report questionnaireSelf-report questionnaire
原典Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Addison-Wesley. link ↗Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices: The erosion of political support in advanced industrial democracies. Oxford University Press. link ↗
別名ICS, Contact Quality IndexDVS, Democratic Attitudes Scale
関連54
概要The Intergroup Contact Scale measures the quantity and quality of face-to-face interaction between members of different social groups (racial, ethnic, religious, national, or other categories). Rooted in Gordon Allport's contact hypothesis (1954), which proposed that prejudice decreases when groups interact under favorable conditions, the scale is fundamental in research on prejudice reduction, integration, and intergroup relations.The Democratic Values Scale measures commitment to core principles of democratic governance including free speech, rule of law, fair elections, protection of minorities, and transparent institutions. Rather than measuring support for democracy as a system (which is nearly universal in principle), it captures depth of commitment to democratic norms, tolerance for dissent, and willingness to protect rights of political opponents. Developed by comparative political scientists including Dalton, Klingemann, and Welzel, it reveals psychological foundations of democratic stability.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Intergroup Contact Scale · Democratic Values Scale. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare