手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 制度的エスノグラフィー× | 現象学× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 質的手法 | 質的手法 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1970s–1987 (developed through the 1970s–80s; consolidated in Smith 1987, 2005) | Early 20th century (Husserl ~1900–1913; Heidegger ~1927) |
| 提唱者≠ | Dorothy E. Smith | Edmund Husserl (transcendental); Martin Heidegger (hermeneutic) |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative research method | Qualitative research approach |
| 原典≠ | Smith, D. E. (2005). Institutional Ethnography: A Sociology for People. AltaMira Press. ISBN: 978-0759105010 | Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological Research Methods. Sage. ISBN: 978-0803957466 |
| 別名≠ | IE, sociology for people, institutional ethnographic inquiry, Smith's institutional ethnography | Fenomenoloji, phenomenological inquiry, phenomenological analysis |
| 関連 | 6 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | Institutional Ethnography (IE) is a qualitative research method developed by Canadian sociologist Dorothy E. Smith that investigates how people's everyday lives are shaped and coordinated by institutional texts, rules, and relations of power. Starting from the lived experience of individuals in a particular standpoint, IE traces the social organization that governs their work and troubles — revealing how macro-level institutions operate through the micro-level activities of real people. | Phenomenology is a qualitative research approach that investigates how participants live through and make sense of a specific experience. Rooted in the philosophy of Edmund Husserl and extended by Martin Heidegger, it aims to reveal the essential structures of lived experience rather than to measure or predict outcomes. The two most widely applied variants are Husserl's transcendental phenomenology, which seeks universal essences, and Heidegger's hermeneutic phenomenology, which emphasises interpretation within context. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|