手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| Infrastructure Studies× | Actor-Network Theory Analysis× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | Science Technology Studies | Science Technology Studies |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1996 | 1984 |
| 提唱者≠ | Susan Leigh Star, Geoffrey Bowker, Karen Ruhleder | Bruno Latour, Michel Callon, John Law |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative method for studying relational infrastructure | Material-semiotic theory and analytic method |
| 原典≠ | Star, S. L., & Ruhleder, K. (1996). Steps toward an ecology of infrastructure: design and access for large information spaces. Information Systems Research, 7(1), 111-134. DOI ↗ | Latour, B. (2005). Reassembling the Social: An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory. Oxford University Press. ISBN: 9780199256051 |
| 別名 | Infrastructural inversion, Ecology of infrastructure, Study of boundary objects | ANT analysis, Sociology of translation, Actant-network mapping |
| 関連 | 4 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | The infrastructure studies method, developed by Susan Leigh Star, Geoffrey Bowker, and Karen Ruhleder, studies the normally invisible relational systems—standards, classifications, pipes, protocols, and installed bases—on which modern life silently depends. Its signature move is 'infrastructural inversion': deliberately foregrounding the background, treating the taken-for-granted substrate as the object of analysis, and reading its standards, classifications, and breakdowns to understand how it shapes work, knowledge, and lives. | Actor-Network Theory analysis treats society and technology as a single woven fabric, mapping how heterogeneous human and non-human actors—engineers, scallops, documents, machines, regulators—are linked into networks through a process of translation. Rather than explaining technical outcomes by appeal to pre-given social categories, ANT follows the actors themselves and describes how durable arrangements are assembled, stabilised, and sometimes undone. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|