ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Ideal Point Estimation×Wordscores×
分野Political Science心理測定学
系統Latent structureLatent structure
提唱年20042003
提唱者Clinton, Jackman & Rivers (Bayesian formulation); Poole & Rosenthal (spatial tradition)Michael Laver, Kenneth Benoit, John Garry
種類Latent-variable spatial model of binary choice dataText analysis and dimension reduction
原典Clinton, J., Jackman, S., & Rivers, D. (2004). The Statistical Analysis of Roll Call Data. American Political Science Review, 98(2), 355–370. DOI ↗Laver, M., Benoit, K., & Garry, J. (2003). Extracting policy positions from political texts using words as data. American Political Science Review, 97(2), 311-331. DOI ↗
別名Ideal point model, Item response theory for roll calls, Spatial voting model, Bayesian ideal points
関連45
概要Ideal point estimation recovers the latent policy positions — ideal points — of political actors from their observed binary choices, most often legislators' yea/nay votes on roll calls. Building on the spatial theory of voting and formalized as a Bayesian item-response model by Clinton, Jackman, and Rivers in 2004, it places each legislator and each bill in a low-dimensional policy space and estimates positions so that the probability a legislator votes yea increases as the bill's 'yea' outcome moves closer to that legislator's ideal point.Wordscores is a text-based scaling method developed by Laver, Benoit, and Garry (2003) that estimates the policy positions of political actors based on word frequencies in their texts. By comparing word usage in reference texts of known positions with test texts, the method infers the latent political dimension of any document without requiring manual coding or training data.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Ideal Point Estimation · Wordscores. 2026-06-24に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare