手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| アイデア盗用および概念窃盗× | 言い換え盗用× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 研究倫理 | 研究倫理 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年 | 1980s | 1980s |
| 提唱者 | Academic integrity framework (modern definition) | Academic integrity framework (modern definition) |
| 種類 | Concept | Concept |
| 原典≠ | Hirsch, L. R. (2013). Recognizing plagiarism: A guide for academic professionals. Teaching Professor Blog. link ↗ | Roig, M. (2015). Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Research Integrity. link ↗ |
| 別名 | conceptual plagiarism, idea theft, intellectual theft | insufficient paraphrase, close paraphrase, lazy paraphrasing |
| 関連≠ | 3 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | Idea plagiarism, or conceptual plagiarism, occurs when an author takes another's ideas, arguments, theories, or conceptual frameworks and presents them as original work without crediting the source. Unlike verbatim or paraphrasing plagiarism (which involve copying language), idea plagiarism involves taking the intellectual content itself—the argument, theory, or framework—regardless of how it is worded. It is the hardest form of plagiarism to detect because it does not require word-for-word copying. | Paraphrasing plagiarism occurs when an author rewrites another's ideas in different words but does not cite the source. Unlike verbatim plagiarism (copying word-for-word), paraphrasing plagiarism involves changing vocabulary and sentence structure while retaining the original argument, logic, or conceptual content without attribution. It is harder to detect than direct copying but is still a clear violation of academic integrity. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|