ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

アイデア盗用および概念窃盗×モザイク盗用×
分野研究倫理研究倫理
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1980s1990s
提唱者Academic integrity framework (modern definition)Academic integrity framework (modern definition)
種類ConceptConcept
原典Hirsch, L. R. (2013). Recognizing plagiarism: A guide for academic professionals. Teaching Professor Blog. link ↗Roig, M. (2015). Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices: A guide to ethical writing. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Office of Research Integrity. link ↗
別名conceptual plagiarism, idea theft, intellectual theftpatch-writing, patchwork plagiarism, incremental plagiarism
関連34
概要Idea plagiarism, or conceptual plagiarism, occurs when an author takes another's ideas, arguments, theories, or conceptual frameworks and presents them as original work without crediting the source. Unlike verbatim or paraphrasing plagiarism (which involve copying language), idea plagiarism involves taking the intellectual content itself—the argument, theory, or framework—regardless of how it is worded. It is the hardest form of plagiarism to detect because it does not require word-for-word copying.Mosaic plagiarism, also called patch-writing, occurs when an author mixes copied phrases and sentences from a source with original text, rearranges material from multiple sources, or interweaves paraphrased and verbatim passages without proper citation or quotation marks. It is difficult to detect because the copied portions are interspersed with original writing, creating a surface appearance of original work.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Idea Plagiarism and Concept Theft · Mosaic Plagiarism. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare