ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

HRAF クロスカルチュラル・アナリシス×同定標本数×
分野考古学考古学
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19671971
提唱者George MurdockR. E. Chaplin
種類Ethnographic comparisonFaunal quantification method
原典Murdock, G. P. (1967). Ethnographic Atlas. University of Pittsburgh Press. link ↗Chaplin, R. E. (1971). The Study of Animal Bones from Archaeological Sites. Seminar Press. link ↗
別名cross-cultural comparison, comparative ethnographyNISP method, specimen count
関連24
概要HRAF (Human Relations Area Files) cross-cultural analysis compares ethnographic data from diverse societies to identify patterns and test hypotheses about human social organization and cultural practices. Developed by George Murdock and colleagues, the method uses a standardized database of ethnographic information coded for comparative analysis. HRAF provides a framework for systematic cross-cultural comparison, helping archaeologists interpret prehistoric patterns through ethnographic analogy.Number of identified specimens (NISP) is a fundamental zooarchaeological method that quantifies the abundance of faunal remains by counting all identifiable bone fragments or specimens in an assemblage. Formalized by R. E. Chaplin and later refined by Donald Grayson and others, NISP is the most straightforward and widely used quantification metric in zooarchaeology. Despite its simplicity, NISP is sensitive to both cultural and taphonomic factors that affect preservation, fragmentation, and identification of bone assemblages.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: HRAF Cross-Cultural Analysis · Number of Identified Specimens. 2026-06-20に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare