手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 異質的処置効果マッチング推定量× | 粗化完全マッチング(CEM)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 因果推論 | 因果推論 |
| 系統 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 提唱年≠ | 1997-2006 | 2011-2012 |
| 提唱者≠ | Heckman, Ichimura & Todd; Abadie & Imbens | Iacus, King, & Porro |
| 種類≠ | Causal inference / nonparametric matching | Matching / causal inference |
| 原典≠ | Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. E. (1997). Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme. Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 605-654. DOI ↗ | Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗ |
| 別名≠ | HTE matching, subgroup matching estimator, conditional matching estimator, CATE matching | CEM, coarsened matching, monotonic imbalance bounding matching |
| 関連 | 6 | 6 |
| 概要≠ | The Heterogeneous Treatment Effect (HTE) Matching Estimator extends standard matching to recover how treatment impacts differ across subgroups or covariate values. Rather than reporting a single average treatment effect, it pairs treated and control units on observed characteristics and then estimates the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) as a function of those characteristics — revealing who benefits most, least, or not at all. | Coarsened Exact Matching is a preprocessing method that achieves covariate balance by temporarily coarsening continuous variables into bins, exactly matching treated and control units within those bins, and then discarding all unmatched units. Introduced by Iacus, King, and Porro (2011, 2012), it bounds imbalance on each covariate independently, yielding a matched sample on which any estimator can be applied without relying on a propensity score model. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|