ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

異質的処置効果マッチング推定量×粗化完全マッチング(CEM)×
分野因果推論因果推論
系統Regression modelRegression model
提唱年1997-20062011-2012
提唱者Heckman, Ichimura & Todd; Abadie & ImbensIacus, King, & Porro
種類Causal inference / nonparametric matchingMatching / causal inference
原典Heckman, J. J., Ichimura, H., & Todd, P. E. (1997). Matching as an Econometric Evaluation Estimator: Evidence from Evaluating a Job Training Programme. Review of Economic Studies, 64(4), 605-654. DOI ↗Iacus, S. M., King, G., & Porro, G. (2012). Causal Inference without Balance Checking: Coarsened Exact Matching. Political Analysis, 20(1), 1-24. DOI ↗
別名HTE matching, subgroup matching estimator, conditional matching estimator, CATE matchingCEM, coarsened matching, monotonic imbalance bounding matching
関連66
概要The Heterogeneous Treatment Effect (HTE) Matching Estimator extends standard matching to recover how treatment impacts differ across subgroups or covariate values. Rather than reporting a single average treatment effect, it pairs treated and control units on observed characteristics and then estimates the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) as a function of those characteristics — revealing who benefits most, least, or not at all.Coarsened Exact Matching is a preprocessing method that achieves covariate balance by temporarily coarsening continuous variables into bins, exactly matching treated and control units within those bins, and then discarding all unmatched units. Introduced by Iacus, King, and Porro (2011, 2012), it bounds imbalance on each covariate independently, yielding a matched sample on which any estimator can be applied without relying on a propensity score model.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Heterogeneous Treatment Effect Matching Estimator · Coarsened Exact Matching. 2026-06-20に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare