手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 異質的処置効果因果影響分析× | 合成コントロール法(SCM)× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 因果推論 | 因果推論 |
| 系統 | Regression model | Regression model |
| 提唱年≠ | 2015-2016 | 2003–2010 |
| 提唱者≠ | Brodersen et al. (causal impact framework, 2015); Athey & Imbens (HTE estimation, 2016) | Alberto Abadie & Javier Gardeazabal (2003); Abadie, Diamond & Hainmueller (2010) |
| 種類≠ | Causal inference / heterogeneous effects estimation | Quasi-experimental causal inference |
| 原典≠ | Brodersen, K. H., Gallusser, F., Koehler, J., Remy, N., & Scott, S. L. (2015). Inferring causal impact using Bayesian structural time-series models. Annals of Applied Statistics, 9(1), 247-274. DOI ↗ | Abadie, A., Diamond, A., & Hainmueller, J. (2010). Synthetic Control Methods for Comparative Case Studies: Estimating the Effect of California's Tobacco Control Program. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 105(490), 493-505. DOI ↗ |
| 別名 | HTE-CausalImpact, CATE causal impact, heterogeneous causal impact, subgroup causal impact analysis | SCM, synthetic control, synth estimator, Abadie-Diamond-Hainmueller method |
| 関連≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | Heterogeneous treatment effect causal impact analysis extends the Bayesian structural time-series causal impact framework to estimate not just the average effect of an intervention but how that effect varies across subgroups or individual units. By combining counterfactual prediction with conditional average treatment effect (CATE) estimation, it reveals which groups benefit most or least from an intervention. | The Synthetic Control Method estimates the causal effect of a treatment or policy on a single treated unit by constructing a weighted combination of untreated units — the synthetic control — that closely resembles the treated unit before the intervention. The gap between the treated unit and its synthetic counterpart after the intervention is the estimated treatment effect. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|