ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

GREY-EDAS×CIMAS (Criterion Impact MeAsurement System)×
分野意思決定意思決定
系統MCDMMCDM
提唱年20172025
提唱者Stanujkic, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Turskis, Z.Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N.
種類Grey outranking/ranking — Grey Interval Number (GIN: [x̲, x̄])Impact-based weighted scoring (criterion-level deviation analysis)
原典Stanujkic, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Turskis, Z. (2017). An Extension of the EDAS Method Based on the Use of Interval Grey Numbers. Studies in Informatics and Control DOI ↗Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. (2025). A New Criteria Importance Assessment (CIMAS) Method in Multi-Criteria Group Decision-Making: Criteria Evaluation for Supplier Selection. FACTA UNIVERSITATIS — Series: Mechanical Engineering DOI ↗
別名
関連88
概要GREY-EDAS (Grey-EDAS — Grey extension of EDAS) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Stanujkic, D., Zavadskas, E. K., Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Turskis, Z. in 2017. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.CIMAS (Criterion Impact MeAsurement System) is a weight subjective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Bošković, S., Jovčić, S., Simić, V., Švadlenka, L., Dobrodolac, M., Bacanin, N. in 2025. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: GREY-EDAS · CIMAS. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare