ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

GRADEエビデンスプロファイリング:エビデンスの確実性と推奨の強さの評価×CONSORTチェックリスト:ランダム化比較試験の報告基準×
分野研究方法論研究方法論
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年20082010 (original 1996)
提唱者Guyatt et al. (GRADE Working Group)Schulz et al. (CONSORT Group)
種類Research team / Guideline panel assessmentTrial author reporting checklist
原典Guyatt, G., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008). GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 336(7650), 924–926. DOI ↗Schulz, K. F., Altman, D. G., & Moher, D. (2010). CONSORT 2010 Statement: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. The Lancet, 375(9721), 1657–1668. DOI ↗
別名GRADE, GRADE approachCONSORT, CONSORT 2010
関連44
概要GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) is a systematic, transparent framework for assessing the certainty of evidence and determining the strength of clinical recommendations in healthcare. Published in 2008 by Guyatt et al., GRADE has become the international standard for guideline development, used by the World Health Organization, Cochrane, and most major clinical guideline organizations worldwide.The CONSORT (Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials) Statement is a 25-item evidence-based checklist and flow diagram developed to standardize reporting of parallel-group randomized controlled trials. First published in 1996 and updated in 2010 (CONSORT 2010), it is endorsed by over 600 journals including The Lancet, JAMA, and BMJ, and is mandatory or strongly recommended for RCT manuscript submission across clinical research.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: GRADE Evidence Profiling · CONSORT Reporting Checklist. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare