手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| GRADEエビデンスプロファイリング：エビデンスの確実性と推奨の強さの評価× | CASP ランダム化比較試験チェックリスト× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 研究方法論 | 研究方法論 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 2008 | 1993 (updated through 2023) |
| 提唱者≠ | Guyatt et al. (GRADE Working Group) | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (Oxford, UK) |
| 種類≠ | Research team / Guideline panel assessment | Clinician-rated / Research team assessment |
| 原典≠ | Guyatt, G., Oxman, A. D., Vist, G. E., Kunz, R., Falck-Ytter, Y., Alonso-Coello, P., & Schünemann, H. J. (2008). GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ, 336(7650), 924–926. DOI ↗ | Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP). (1993, updated). CASP Randomised Controlled Trials Checklist. University of Oxford, UK. www.casp-uk.net link ↗ |
| 別名 | GRADE, GRADE approach | CASP-RCT, CASP |
| 関連 | 4 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) is a systematic, transparent framework for assessing the certainty of evidence and determining the strength of clinical recommendations in healthcare. Published in 2008 by Guyatt et al., GRADE has become the international standard for guideline development, used by the World Health Organization, Cochrane, and most major clinical guideline organizations worldwide. | The Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (CASP) RCT Checklist is a practical, widely adopted tool developed by the UK-based Critical Appraisal Skills Programme (founded 1993) for assessing the methodological quality and relevance of published randomized controlled trials. Unlike numeric scoring scales, it uses 11 structured questions with yes/no/cannot tell responses to guide critical appraisal in a format accessible to busy clinicians, researchers, and educators. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|