ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

継続企業の評価×監査における分析的手続×
分野会計学会計学
系統MCDMMCDM
提唱年19881983
提唱者American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB)American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA)
種類Audit assessment and reporting frameworkAudit procedure methodology
原典American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Evaluating Compliance with Going Concern Assumption. AU-C Section 570. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA). (2015). Analytical Procedures. AU-C Section 520. AICPA Professional Standards. link ↗
別名Going Concern Analysis, Entity Viability Assessment, Continuity EvaluationAnalytical Review, Ratio Analysis, Trend Analysis
関連34
概要Going Concern Evaluation is an auditor framework for assessing whether the entity being audited will be able to continue operating and meeting its obligations in the foreseeable future (typically, one year from the financial statement date). Required by auditing standards, this assessment examines financial and operational indicators of distress and evaluates management's plans to address concerns, ultimately determining whether financial statements require modification or special disclosure.Analytical procedures are evaluations of financial information made by studying plausible relationships among both financial and non-financial data. Rather than testing individual transactions, auditors develop expectations about what numbers should be and compare them to actual results, investigating significant differences. This approach is both required during audit planning and is often more cost-effective than detailed transaction testing.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Going Concern Evaluation · Analytical Procedures in Auditing. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare