ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

森林火災リスク評価×Silvicultural Treatment Design×
分野林学林学
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1950s–2000s1950s–2000s
提唱者Van Wagner, Rothermel, and fire ecology research communitySmith, Larson, and classical silviculture
種類Assessment and modeling pipelinePlanning and decision pipeline
原典Agee, J. K. (2000). The Ecology of Pacific Northwest Forests. Island Press. link ↗Smith, D. M., Larson, B. C., Kelty, M. J., & Ashton, P. M. S. (1997). The Practice of Silviculture: Applied Forest Ecology (9th ed.). John Wiley & Sons. link ↗
別名Wildfire risk assessment, Fire hazard mapping, Burn severity predictionSilvicultural prescription, Stand treatment planning, Forest management design
関連44
概要Forest fire risk assessment quantifies the probability and potential severity of wildfire in forest ecosystems, integrating stand structure, fuel characteristics, weather patterns, and topography. Developed by Van Wagner, Rothermel, and fire science communities, fire risk models predict fire ignition likelihood, fire behavior (spread rate, intensity), and consequences (area burned, damage extent). Essential for land management planning, community protection, and ecosystem conservation.Silvicultural treatment design is the process of developing specific management prescriptions for forest stands to achieve defined objectives (timber yield, biodiversity, carbon storage, watershed protection). Codified in foundational texts by Smith and colleagues, silvicultural design integrates stand assessment, growth models, and ecosystem understanding to specify interventions (thinning, shelterwood, clear-cut, rotation-age modification) that steer forest development toward intended outcomes while respecting ecological constraints.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 4 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Forest Fire Risk Assessment · Silvicultural Treatment Design. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare