ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

フォーカスグループ・方法論×参与観察×
分野質的研究質的研究
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19561922
提唱者Robert K. Merton and Paul F. LazarsfeldBronislaw Malinowski
種類MethodMethod
原典Krueger, R. A. (1994). Focus Groups: A Practical Guide for Applied Research. SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-0803954366Geertz, C. (1973). The Interpretation of Cultures. Basic Books. ISBN: 978-0465026432
別名FGD, focus group discussion, group interviewethnographic observation, participatory observation, overt observation, immersive observation
関連44
概要Focus group discussions are a qualitative research method in which a trained moderator guides a small group (typically 6–12 participants) through structured or semi-structured discussion of a specific topic or product. Developed by Merton and Lazarsfeld in the 1950s for market research, focus groups are now widely used in health sciences, education, social sciences, and policy research. The method leverages group interaction to generate rich, contextual insights that individual interviews may not reveal.Participant observation is a qualitative research method in which the researcher embeds themselves within a community, organization, or social setting for an extended period, engaging in the activities and relationships of the group while systematically observing and documenting behavior, interactions, and cultural meaning. Pioneered by Malinowski in the 1920s and developed in anthropology, the method has been adopted across sociology, education, health sciences, and organizational research. The researcher functions as both insider (participating in group activities) and outsider (maintaining analytical distance), generating thick description—rich accounts of context, behavior, and meaning that reveal how people actually live and interact.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 4 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Focus Group Methodology · Participant Observation. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare