ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

有限要素モデルの更新と較正×レインフロー計数法×
分野信頼性工学信頼性工学
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年20011974
提唱者John Mottershead and Michael FriswellTatsuo Endo
種類System identification methodologyCycle counting algorithm
原典Mottershead, J. E., Link, M., & Friswell, M. I. (2011). The sensitivity method in finite element model updating: A tutorial. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 25(7), 2275-2296. DOI ↗Goodman, J. (1899). Mechanics Applied to Engineering. Longman, Green and Co. link ↗
別名Model updating, Model calibration, FEM updatingRainflow cycle counting, RFC
関連44
概要Finite Element Model (FEM) Updating is the process of refining a numerical structural model to match measured behavior (modal properties, vibrations, static displacements) from the physical structure. By comparing computational predictions to experimental data and systematically adjusting uncertain model parameters (material properties, boundary conditions, joint stiffness), engineers create more accurate models for design decisions, damage detection, and life prediction. Formalized by Mottershead and Friswell, FEM updating bridges the gap between idealized computer models and real-world structures.Rainflow counting is a fatigue cycle counting method that converts a complex stress history into individual cycles for damage assessment. Developed by Tatsuo Endo and colleagues in 1974, it provides the most physically realistic representation of fatigue damage when combined with Miner's linear cumulative damage hypothesis. The algorithm has become the industry standard in reliability engineering and vibration analysis.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 4 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 4 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Finite Element Model Updating · Rainflow Counting. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare