ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

フィールドノート――質的研究における観察記録×研究ダイアリー×
分野調査方法論調査方法論
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年Late 19th century (formalized in 20th century)1981 (methodological codification); diary use in research dates to 19th-century anthropology
提唱者Rooted in 19th-century anthropology and sociology; systematized by ethnographers such as Bronislaw Malinowski and later Robert Emerson et al.Robert G. Burgess (systematic methodological treatment)
種類Qualitative data collection and recording techniqueQualitative data collection and reflexivity tool
原典Emerson, R. M., Fretz, R. I., & Shaw, L. L. (1995). Writing Ethnographic Fieldnotes. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226206813Burgess, R. G. (1981). Keeping a research diary. Cambridge Journal of Education, 11(1), 75–83. link ↗
別名fieldnotes, observational notes, ethnographic notes, jottingsresearcher diary, field diary, research journal, reflexive diary
関連66
概要Field notes are detailed written records created by researchers during or immediately after direct observation in a naturalistic setting. They capture what is seen, heard, and experienced — including behaviors, interactions, physical environments, and the researcher's own analytic impressions — forming the primary data source for ethnographic and observational studies.A research diary is a systematic, dated log maintained by the researcher throughout a study to record methodological decisions, emergent observations, analytical hunches, and reflections on researcher positionality. Unlike a participant diary, it is authored by the researcher and functions simultaneously as a data source, an audit trail, and a reflexivity instrument.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Field Notes · Research Diary. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare