ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

フィールドベースの現象学×ナラティブ・インクワイアリー×
分野質的手法質的研究
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1980s–1990s (van Manen's synthesis; broader tradition from early 20th century)2000
提唱者Max van Manen (systematic field application); rooted in Husserl and HeideggerD. Jean Clandinin and F. Michael Connelly
種類Qualitative research approachMethod
原典van Manen, M. (1990). Researching Lived Experience: Human Science for an Action Sensitive Pedagogy. State University of New York Press. ISBN: 978-0791404508Clandinin, D. J., & Connelly, F. M. (2000). Narrative inquiry: Experience and story in qualitative research. Jossey-Bass. link ↗
別名naturalistic phenomenology, field phenomenology, phenomenological fieldwork, in-situ phenomenological inquiryNarrative Analysis, Narrative Research, Life Story Method
関連63
概要Field-based phenomenology is a qualitative approach that investigates the lived experience of a phenomenon by collecting data in the natural environments where that experience actually unfolds — rather than exclusively in interview rooms. Drawing on the phenomenological tradition of Husserl and Heidegger, and systematised by Max van Manen, it combines sustained fieldwork observation with open-ended, in-situ conversation to capture the experiential texture of phenomena as participants encounter them in everyday life.Narrative inquiry is a qualitative research methodology that treats stories and life narratives as primary data, analyzing how individuals construct meaning and identity through storytelling. Developed by D. Jean Clandinin and F. Michael Connelly (2000), narrative inquiry examines the narratives people tell about their lives, experiences, and transitions, understanding that people make sense of experience through narrative.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Field-based phenomenology · Narrative Inquiry. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare