ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

フィールドベースの比喩分析×Thematic Analysis×
分野質的手法質的研究
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1990s–2000s (field-based applications)2006
提唱者Rooted in Lakoff & Johnson (1980); field-based application developed across educational and social science research from the 1990s onwardVirginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
種類Qualitative analytic methodMethod
原典Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. ISBN: 978-0226468013Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
別名field metaphor elicitation, naturalistic metaphor analysis, contextual metaphor analysis, FbMATA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
関連53
概要Field-based metaphor analysis is a qualitative method that collects and interprets spontaneous or elicited metaphors from participants in their natural settings. Grounded in Lakoff and Johnson's conceptual metaphor theory, it reveals how individuals and communities structure abstract concepts — such as teaching, leadership, or illness — through figurative language encountered or produced in real contexts. Unlike purely document-based metaphor studies, field-based variants combine data collection in natural field settings with systematic analytic coding.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Field-based Metaphor Analysis · Thematic Analysis. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare