ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

フィールドベース談話分析×Thematic Analysis×
分野質的手法質的研究
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1980s–1990s2006
提唱者Synthesised from Pierre Bourdieu's field theory and discourse analysis; systematised by researchers including John FrowVirginia Braun and Victoria Clarke
種類Qualitative analytical frameworkMethod
原典Bourdieu, P. (1991). Language and Symbolic Power. Harvard University Press. ISBN: 978-0674510302Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. DOI ↗
別名field discourse analysis, Bourdieusian discourse analysis, sociological discourse analysis, FDATA, Reflexive Thematic Analysis
関連63
概要Field-based discourse analysis integrates Pierre Bourdieu's sociological concept of the field — a structured social space of positions, capital, and struggle — with the close textual methods of discourse analysis. Rather than treating language as a neutral medium, it examines how discourse is produced, circulated, and received within specific social fields (education, law, journalism, science, etc.), and how discursive choices reflect and reproduce the distribution of power and capital within those fields.Thematic Analysis (TA) is a qualitative research methodology for identifying, analyzing, and reporting patterns (themes) in qualitative data. Developed systematically by Virginia Braun and Victoria Clarke (2006), TA is flexible and accessible, applicable across diverse theoretical frameworks and data types, making it one of the most widely used qualitative methods in psychology, health research, and social sciences.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Field-based Discourse Analysis · Thematic Analysis. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare