ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Feminist Standpoint Analysis×批判的談話分析×
分野Gender Studies質的手法
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1983Late 1970s–1990s (systematised ~1979–1995)
提唱者Nancy Hartsock, Dorothy Smith, Sandra HardingNorman Fairclough; Teun A. van Dijk; Ruth Wodak
種類Critical feminist epistemology and analytic frameworkQualitative research method
原典Harding, S. (1991). Whose Science? Whose Knowledge? Thinking from Women's Lives. Cornell University Press, Ithaca, NY. ISBN: 9780801497469Fairclough, N. (1992). Discourse and Social Change. Polity Press. link ↗
別名Standpoint Theory, Feminist Standpoint Epistemology, Standpoint MethodologyCDA, Critical Linguistics, Discourse-Historical Approach, Dialectical-Relational Analysis
関連46
概要Feminist standpoint analysis is a critical epistemology and analytic strategy holding that all knowledge is socially situated, and that beginning inquiry from the everyday lives of marginalized people — historically women — yields a more complete and less distorted account of social reality than the supposedly neutral view from dominant positions. Developed by Nancy Hartsock, Dorothy Smith, and Sandra Harding in the 1980s, it argues that the marginalized see both the dominant order and its underside, and that this doubled vision, when methodically developed into an achieved standpoint, can ground a 'strong objectivity' superior to claims of value-free detachment.Critical Discourse Analysis (CDA) is a qualitative method that examines how language in texts and talk constructs, sustains, and challenges relations of power, ideology, and social inequality. Drawing on linguistics, social theory, and critical philosophy, CDA treats discourse not merely as communication but as social practice — a site where dominance is reproduced and where resistance can be articulated. Developed in the late twentieth century by Norman Fairclough, Teun van Dijk, and Ruth Wodak, among others, CDA is applied to political speeches, media texts, policy documents, educational materials, and institutional interactions.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Feminist Standpoint Analysis · Critical Discourse Analysis. 2026-06-25に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare