手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| フェミニスト研究方法論× | 談話分析× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野≠ | 質的手法 | 質的研究 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1970s–1980s (formalized as a methodology) | 1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell) |
| 提唱者≠ | Sandra Harding, Dorothy Smith, Patricia Hill Collins, and the broader feminist social science movement | Norman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell |
| 種類≠ | Qualitative research method | Method |
| 原典≠ | Harding, S. (Ed.). (1987). Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues. Indiana University Press. link ↗ | Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗ |
| 別名≠ | feminist inquiry, feminist qualitative research, feminist standpoint research, gender-critical research | DA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis |
| 関連≠ | 6 | 2 |
| 概要≠ | Feminist research methodology is a qualitative approach grounded in feminist theory that centres gender, power, and social justice as core analytical lenses. It challenges claims of value-free objectivity, foregrounds the voices and experiences of marginalized groups — particularly women — and explicitly positions the researcher as a political and social actor. Developed across disciplines including sociology, education, and health sciences, it draws on standpoint theory, intersectionality, and participatory ethics to produce knowledge that can inform emancipatory practice. | Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|