ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

フェミニスト研究方法論×談話分析×
分野質的手法質的研究
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1970s–1980s (formalized as a methodology)1989 (Fairclough); 1987 (Potter & Wetherell)
提唱者Sandra Harding, Dorothy Smith, Patricia Hill Collins, and the broader feminist social science movementNorman Fairclough; Jonathan Potter and Margaret Wetherell
種類Qualitative research methodMethod
原典Harding, S. (Ed.). (1987). Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues. Indiana University Press. link ↗Fairclough, N. (1989). Language and power. Longman. link ↗
別名feminist inquiry, feminist qualitative research, feminist standpoint research, gender-critical researchDA, Critical Discourse Analysis, Discursive Analysis
関連62
概要Feminist research methodology is a qualitative approach grounded in feminist theory that centres gender, power, and social justice as core analytical lenses. It challenges claims of value-free objectivity, foregrounds the voices and experiences of marginalized groups — particularly women — and explicitly positions the researcher as a political and social actor. Developed across disciplines including sociology, education, and health sciences, it draws on standpoint theory, intersectionality, and participatory ethics to produce knowledge that can inform emancipatory practice.Discourse analysis is a qualitative research methodology that examines how language, communication, and power shape meaning, identity, and social reality. Developed across linguistics, sociology, and psychology (particularly by Norman Fairclough and Jonathan Potter), discourse analysis goes beyond content to analyze language use as a social practice that constitutes and reflects power relations, ideologies, and social structures.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Feminist Research Methodology · Discourse Analysis. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare