ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

フェミニスト研究方法論×アクションリサーチ×
分野質的手法質的研究
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1970s–1980s (formalized as a methodology)1946
提唱者Sandra Harding, Dorothy Smith, Patricia Hill Collins, and the broader feminist social science movementKurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & Bradbury
種類Qualitative research methodMethod
原典Harding, S. (Ed.). (1987). Feminism and Methodology: Social Science Issues. Indiana University Press. link ↗Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗
別名feminist inquiry, feminist qualitative research, feminist standpoint research, gender-critical researchParticipatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiry
関連61
概要Feminist research methodology is a qualitative approach grounded in feminist theory that centres gender, power, and social justice as core analytical lenses. It challenges claims of value-free objectivity, foregrounds the voices and experiences of marginalized groups — particularly women — and explicitly positions the researcher as a political and social actor. Developed across disciplines including sociology, education, and health sciences, it draws on standpoint theory, intersectionality, and participatory ethics to produce knowledge that can inform emancipatory practice.Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Feminist Research Methodology · Action Research. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare