ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Feeling Thermometer Analysis×Candidate Evaluation Model×
分野政治心理学政治心理学
系統Process / pipelineLatent structure
提唱年19641995
提唱者American National Election Studies / Aage ClausenMilton Lodge, Marco Steenbergen & Donald Kinder
種類Affect rating instrumentLatent evaluation model
原典Wilcox, C., Sigelman, L., & Cook, E. (1989). Some like it hot: Individual differences in responses to group feeling thermometers. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53(2), 246-257. DOI ↗Lodge, M., Steenbergen, M. R., & Brau, S. (1995). The responsive voter: Campaign information and the dynamics of candidate evaluation. American Political Science Review, 89(2), 309-326. DOI ↗
別名Feeling Thermometer, Affect Thermometer, Thermometer Rating ScaleImpression-Driven Evaluation Model, Online Processing Model, Candidate Trait Evaluation Model
関連44
概要The feeling thermometer is a survey instrument that asks respondents to rate their warmth or favorability toward a person, group, or institution on a 0-to-100 scale, where 0 is very cold/unfavorable, 100 is very warm/favorable, and 50 is neutral. Introduced in the American National Election Studies in the 1960s, it is the standard measure of political affect, and its analysis underpins candidate evaluation, group affect, and affective-polarization research.A candidate evaluation model represents how voters form overall assessments of political candidates as a latent function of perceived traits (competence, leadership, integrity, empathy), partisanship, issue proximity, and affect. It spans the trait-based factor models of Kinder et al. (1980) and the online-processing tally model of Lodge, Steenbergen and Brau (1995), which describes evaluation as a running summary updated as information arrives.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Feeling Thermometer Analysis · Candidate Evaluation Model. 2026-06-24に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare