ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Feeling Thermometer Analysis×Affective Polarization Measurement×
分野政治心理学政治心理学
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19642012
提唱者American National Election Studies / Aage ClausenShanto Iyengar, Gaurav Sood & Yphtach Lelkes
種類Affect rating instrumentComposite survey index
原典Wilcox, C., Sigelman, L., & Cook, E. (1989). Some like it hot: Individual differences in responses to group feeling thermometers. Public Opinion Quarterly, 53(2), 246-257. DOI ↗Iyengar, S., Sood, G., & Lelkes, Y. (2012). Affect, not ideology: A social identity perspective on polarization. Public Opinion Quarterly, 76(3), 405-431. DOI ↗
別名Feeling Thermometer, Affect Thermometer, Thermometer Rating ScaleAffective Polarization Index, Partisan Affect Gap, Thermometer Difference Measure
関連44
概要The feeling thermometer is a survey instrument that asks respondents to rate their warmth or favorability toward a person, group, or institution on a 0-to-100 scale, where 0 is very cold/unfavorable, 100 is very warm/favorable, and 50 is neutral. Introduced in the American National Election Studies in the 1960s, it is the standard measure of political affect, and its analysis underpins candidate evaluation, group affect, and affective-polarization research.Affective polarization measurement quantifies the gap between how positively people feel toward their own political party (the in-party) and how negatively they feel toward the opposing party (the out-party). Iyengar, Sood and Lelkes (2012) showed that this affective divide has grown sharply even where issue positions have not, reframing polarization as a social-identity phenomenon of partisan like and dislike rather than ideological distance.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Feeling Thermometer Analysis · Affective Polarization Measurement. 2026-06-25に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare