ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

因子関係重み付け法×適応標準化区間に基づく代替順位付け手法×
分野意思決定意思決定
系統MCDMMCDM
提唱年20202024
提唱者Žižović, M., Pamucar, D., Marinkovic, D., Žižović, M. M.Kara, K., Yalçın, G. C., Kaygısız, E. G., Simic, V., Örnek, A. Ş., Pamucar, D.
種類Weight_Subjective (pairwise factor relationship matrix, closed-form weights)Two-level standardization + ideal/anti-ideal utility (β-anchored)
原典Žižović, M., Pamucar, D., Marinkovic, D., Žižović, M. M. (2020). Novel integrated multi-criteria ranking methodology: Case of public administration efficiency. European Journal of Operational Research link ↗Kara, K., Yalçın, G. C., Kaygısız, E. G., Simic, V., Örnek, A. Ş., Pamucar, D. (2024). A picture fuzzy CIMAS-ARTASI model for website performance analysis in human resource management. Applied Soft Computing DOI ↗
別名
関連88
概要FARE (Factor Relationship weighting method) is a weight objective multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Žižović, M., Pamucar, D., Marinkovic, D., Žižović, M. M. in 2020. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.ARTASI (Alternative Ranking Technique based on Adaptive Standardized Intervals) is a ranking multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) method introduced by Kara, K., Yalçın, G. C., Kaygısız, E. G., Simic, V., Örnek, A. Ş., Pamucar, D. in 2024. It turns a decision matrix of alternatives scored on multiple criteria into a structured, reproducible result.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 1 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: FARE · ARTASI. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare