手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 故障モード影響解析 (FMEA)× | シックスシグマDMAIC× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野≠ | 実験計画法 | 品質管理 |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1949 (military); widespread industrial adoption 1970s–1980s | 2014 |
| 提唱者≠ | U.S. Military / NASA (formalized by MIL-P-1629, 1949) | Motorola; Pyzdek & Keller |
| 種類≠ | Proactive risk analysis technique | Structured process improvement methodology |
| 原典≠ | Stamatis, D. H. (2003). Failure Mode and Effect Analysis: FMEA from Theory to Execution (2nd ed.). ASQ Quality Press. ISBN: 978-0873895989 | Pyzdek, T., & Keller, P. (2014). The Six Sigma Handbook (4th ed.). McGraw-Hill. ISBN: 978-0-07-184053-9 |
| 別名 | FMEA, Failure Modes and Effects Analysis, FMECA, Failure Mode Effects and Criticality Analysis | DMAIC Framework, Six Sigma Process Improvement Cycle, Define-Measure-Analyze-Improve-Control, Altı Sigma DMAIC |
| 関連≠ | 6 | 3 |
| 概要≠ | Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (FMEA) is a structured, proactive risk management technique used to identify potential failure modes in a system, process, or product design, evaluate their consequences, and prioritize corrective actions before failures occur. Originally developed for the U.S. military in 1949 and later adopted by NASA, automotive, and manufacturing industries, FMEA is now a cornerstone quality-engineering tool embedded in standards such as AIAG-VDA and ISO 9001-aligned processes. | Six Sigma DMAIC is a data-driven, five-phase process improvement methodology — Define, Measure, Analyze, Improve, and Control — used to reduce defects and process variation to fewer than 3.4 defects per million opportunities. Originating at Motorola in the 1980s and systematized by practitioners including Pyzdek and Keller, it is widely adopted in manufacturing, healthcare, finance, and service industries seeking sustained quality gains. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|