手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 説明的研究× | 因果比較研究× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 研究デザイン | 研究デザイン |
| 系統 | Process / pipeline | Process / pipeline |
| 提唱年≠ | 1960s–1980s (codified in behavioral and social science methodology) | 1964 |
| 提唱者≠ | Formalized by Earl Babbie and Fred Kerlinger among others | Fred N. Kerlinger |
| 種類 | Non-experimental quantitative research design | Non-experimental quantitative research design |
| 原典≠ | Kerlinger, F. N. (1986). Foundations of Behavioral Research (3rd ed.). Holt, Rinehart and Winston. ISBN: 978-0030417559 | Kerlinger, F. N. (1964). Foundations of Behavioral Research. Holt, Rinehart and Winston. link ↗ |
| 別名 | analytical research, causal research, explanatory study, explanatory quantitative research | ex post facto research, causal-comparative design, retrospective causal study, CCR |
| 関連≠ | 5 | 3 |
| 概要≠ | Explanatory research is a non-experimental quantitative research design that goes beyond describing a phenomenon to identifying why it occurs — examining the relationships or mechanisms that account for observed patterns. Rooted in positivist social science methodology, it uses theory-driven hypotheses and statistical analysis to test whether specific variables explain variation in an outcome, without necessarily manipulating those variables. | Causal-comparative research is a non-experimental quantitative design in which the researcher compares two or more groups that already differ on an independent variable — one that was not manipulated — to investigate possible causes or consequences of that difference. Because group membership is pre-existing rather than randomly assigned, the design can suggest causal relationships but cannot establish them with the certainty of a true experiment. It is widely used in education, psychology, and social sciences when experimental manipulation is impractical or unethical. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|