手法を比較
選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。
| 説明可能な質問応答× | Explainable Transformer× | |
|---|---|---|
| 分野 | 深層学習 | 深層学習 |
| 系統 | Machine learning | Machine learning |
| 提唱年≠ | 2016–2020 | 2017–2021 |
| 提唱者≠ | Community (DeYoung et al.; Rajpurkar et al.) | Vaswani et al. (Transformer); explainability extensions by Chefer et al. and the broader XAI community |
| 種類≠ | Interpretable NLP pipeline | Interpretable deep learning model |
| 原典≠ | DeYoung, J., Jain, S., Rajani, N. F., Lehman, E., Xiong, C., Socher, R., & Wallace, B. C. (2020). ERASER: A Benchmark to Evaluate Rationalized NLP Models. In Proceedings of ACL 2020, pp. 4443–4458. DOI ↗ | Vaswani, A., Shazeer, N., Parmar, N., Uszkoreit, J., Jones, L., Gomez, A. N., Kaiser, L., & Polosukhin, I. (2017). Attention is all you need. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 30. link ↗ |
| 別名 | XQA, interpretable QA, transparent question answering, rationale-based QA | XAI Transformer, Interpretable Transformer, Transparent Transformer, Explainable Attention Model |
| 関連≠ | 5 | 4 |
| 概要≠ | Explainable Question Answering (XQA) combines neural reading-comprehension models — typically BERT-family transformers — with interpretability methods such as rationale extraction, attention visualization, LIME, or SHAP to reveal why the model selected a particular answer span. The goal is not just accuracy but trustworthy, auditable reasoning that users and domain experts can inspect and verify. | An Explainable Transformer combines a standard or pre-trained Transformer architecture with post-hoc or built-in interpretability techniques — such as attention rollout, gradient-weighted attention, or SHAP — to reveal which input tokens or regions drove each prediction. The approach bridges high predictive accuracy with the transparency required in high-stakes or regulated domains. |
| ScholarGateデータセット ↗ |
|
|