ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

専門家インタビュー×アクションリサーチ×
分野質的手法質的研究
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年1970s–1990s (methodologically systematized)1946
提唱者Meuser & Nagel (methodological codification, 1991); roots in elite interview tradition (Dexter, 1970)Kurt Lewin; expanded by Kemmis, McTaggart, Reason & Bradbury
種類Qualitative research methodMethod
原典Bogner, A., Littig, B., & Menz, W. (Eds.). (2009). Interviewing Experts. Palgrave Macmillan. link ↗Lewin, K. (1946). Action research and minority problems. Journal of Social Issues, 2(4), 34–46. DOI ↗
別名elite interview, key informant interview, specialist interviewParticipatory Action Research, PAR, Collaborative Inquiry
関連61
概要The expert interview is a qualitative method in which researchers conduct in-depth, semi-structured conversations with individuals who hold specialised knowledge, experience, or decision-making authority in a defined field. Unlike general population interviews that target subjective lived experience, expert interviews treat respondents as proxies for a broader institutional or professional knowledge domain. The method is widely used in policy research, organisational studies, science and technology studies, and applied social sciences to map tacit professional knowledge, reconstruct decision processes, and triangulate documentary sources.Action research is a collaborative research methodology in which researchers work with practitioners and community members to investigate a problem, implement change, and evaluate outcomes, cycling through reflection, action, and learning. Developed by Kurt Lewin (1946), action research bridges research and practice, aiming simultaneously to produce knowledge and practical improvement.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 3 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Expert Interview · Action Research. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare