ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Evidence-Based Practice Process×Rapid Assessment Instrument×
分野Social WorkSocial Work
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19962002
提唱者Evidence-based medicine tradition (Sackett et al.); translated to social work by Gambrill and othersWalter W. Hudson and the clinical-measurement tradition; codified by Springer, Abell & Hudson
種類Structured process for integrating evidence, expertise, and client values in practice decisionsBrief, standardized, self-report measure for repeated use in practice
原典Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996). Evidence based medicine: What it is and what it isn't. BMJ, 312(7023), 71–72. DOI ↗Springer, D. W., Abell, N., & Hudson, W. W. (2002). Creating and validating rapid assessment instruments for practice and research: Part 1. Research on Social Work Practice, 12(3), 408–439. DOI ↗
別名EBP Process, Evidence-Based Practice (Process Model), Five-Step EBP Process, Evidence-Informed Practice ProcessRAI, Rapid Assessment Instruments, Brief Standardized Self-Report Scale, Clinical Measurement Package Scales
関連44
概要The evidence-based practice (EBP) process is a structured, five-step way of making practice decisions by integrating the best available research evidence with professional expertise and the client's values and circumstances. Originating in evidence-based medicine as defined by Sackett and colleagues and translated into social work by Eileen Gambrill and others, it reframes EBP not as a fixed list of approved programs but as a transparent decision process — ask, acquire, appraise, apply, assess — that an individual practitioner carries out with and for a particular client.A rapid assessment instrument (RAI) is a short, standardized, self-report measure designed to be completed quickly and repeatedly so that a social worker can assess the magnitude of a client's problem, compare it against a validated clinical cutoff, and monitor change over the course of an intervention. The format was championed by Walter Hudson, whose Clinical Measurement Package scales set the template, and was systematized for practitioners by Springer, Abell, and Hudson, who laid out how to create and validate such instruments for practice and research.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Evidence-Based Practice Process · Rapid Assessment Instrument. 2026-06-24に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare