手法を比較

	評価に焦点を当てた多段階混合研究法	変容的混合研究法デザイン
分野	研究デザイン	研究デザイン
系統	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
提唱年	2007–2009 (multiphase design formalized 2007; evaluation-focused applications consolidated ca. 2009)	2003–2009
提唱者	John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (multiphase design); Stewart I. Donaldson and colleagues (evaluation-focused framing)	Donna M. Mertens; John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark
種類	Mixed methods research design — program evaluation variant	Mixed methods research design
原典	Donaldson, S. I., Christie, C. A., & Mark, M. M. (Eds.). (2009). What Counts as Credible Evidence in Applied Research and Evaluation Practice? Sage. ISBN: 978-1412957090	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379
別名	evaluation multiphase mixed methods, program evaluation multiphase design, mixed methods program evaluation, evaluative multiphase design	transformative design, advocacy mixed methods, emancipatory mixed methods, social-justice mixed methods
関連	6	6
概要	The evaluation-focused multiphase mixed methods design applies the multiphase mixed methods framework explicitly to program evaluation contexts, orchestrating three or more sequential or iterative phases — each drawing on quantitative measures, qualitative inquiry, or both — to assess a program, policy, or intervention from needs assessment through impact evaluation. An overarching evaluation question unifies all phases, and findings from each phase directly shape the evaluation questions and methods of the next.	Transformative mixed methods design embeds a social-justice or advocacy theoretical framework — such as feminism, critical race theory, disability studies, or indigenous worldviews — as the overarching lens that guides every decision about data collection, integration, and use. Both quantitative and qualitative strands serve the goal of advancing equity, challenging power structures, and producing actionable knowledge for marginalized communities.