手法を比較

	均等重み付け実用主義的混合研究法デザイン	プラグマティック混合研究法デザイン
分野	研究デザイン	研究デザイン
系統	Process / pipeline	Process / pipeline
提唱年	2000s–2010s	Early 2000s (formalised); pragmatism as philosophy late 19th–early 20th century
提唱者	Creswell, Plano Clark, Johnson, Onwuegbuzie (mixed methods methodology scholars)	John W. Creswell & Vicki L. Plano Clark (formalised); philosophical grounding in William James, John Dewey, Richard Rorty
種類	Mixed methods research design	Mixed methods research design
原典	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). Sage. ISBN: 978-1483344379	Creswell, J. W., & Plano Clark, V. L. (2018). Designing and Conducting Mixed Methods Research (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications. ISBN: 978-1483344379
別名	equal-status pragmatic MMR, QUAL=QUAN pragmatic design, balanced pragmatic mixed methods, equal-priority pragmatic design	pragmatic MMR, pragmatism-guided mixed methods, pragmatic inquiry design, practical mixed methods
関連	6	6
概要	Equal-weight pragmatic mixed methods is a research design in which quantitative and qualitative strands are assigned the same methodological priority (QUAL = QUAN) and conducted from a pragmatist philosophical stance. Rather than privileging one paradigm, the researcher selects and combines methods that best answer the research question — treating practical utility as the primary criterion for all design decisions.	Pragmatic mixed methods design is a research approach that selects and combines quantitative and qualitative methods based on what best answers the research question, rather than adhering to a single philosophical paradigm. Rooted in the philosophical tradition of pragmatism — associated with William James, John Dewey, and later Richard Rorty — it treats methodological fit and practical utility as the primary criteria for design decisions. The approach is endorsed by leading mixed methods scholars including Creswell and Plano Clark as the most common philosophical worldview underpinning mixed methods work.