手法を比較

	アンサンブル決定木	バギング（ブートストラップ集約）	ブースティング
分野	機械学習	機械学習	機械学習
系統	Machine learning	Machine learning	Machine learning
提唱年	1996–2000	1996	1990–1997
提唱者	Breiman, L.; Dietterich, T. G.	Breiman, L.	Schapire, R. E.; Freund, Y.
種類	Ensemble (multiple decision trees combined)	Ensemble meta-algorithm (variance reduction via bootstrap aggregation)	Sequential ensemble (iterative reweighting)
原典	Dietterich, T. G. (2000). Ensemble methods in machine learning. In Multiple Classifier Systems, Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 1857, pp. 1–15. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.	Breiman, L. (1996). Bagging Predictors. Machine Learning, 24(2), 123–140.	Freund, Y. & Schapire, R. E. (1997). A decision-theoretic generalization of on-line learning and an application to boosting. Journal of Computer and System Sciences, 55(1), 119–139.
別名	decision tree ensemble, ensemble of decision trees, combined decision trees, multiple classifier system (decision trees)	Bootstrap Aggregating, bootstrap aggregation, bagged ensemble, bagged predictor	AdaBoost, gradient boosting, iterative reweighting ensemble, sequential ensemble
関連	6	5	6
概要	Ensemble Decision Tree methods train multiple decision trees and combine their outputs to produce predictions that are more accurate and stable than any single tree. Covering strategies such as bagging, random subspacing, and voting, they are among the most effective off-the-shelf techniques for tabular classification and regression tasks.	Bagging, short for Bootstrap Aggregating, is an ensemble meta-algorithm introduced by Leo Breiman in 1996 that trains multiple copies of a base learner on independently drawn bootstrap samples of the training data and combines their predictions — by averaging for regression or majority vote for classification — to produce a final predictor with substantially lower variance than any single base learner.	Boosting is a sequential ensemble technique that converts many simple, barely-better-than-chance learners into a single highly accurate model by repeatedly focusing training on the examples that previous learners got wrong, then combining all learners with weights proportional to their individual accuracy.