ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

Nijmegen Questionnaire for Dysfunctional Breathing×慢性呼吸器疾患質問票×
分野呼吸器学呼吸器学
系統Process / pipelineProcess / pipeline
提唱年19941987
提唱者van Beveren and colleagues, NetherlandsGordon H. Guyatt, McMaster University
種類Self-report questionnaireSelf-report or interviewer-administered questionnaire
原典Van Beveren, T. L., Fülöp, M., van Beek, H. G., & Zijlstra, F. J. (1994). Hyperventilation and panic panic attacks in a group of asthma patients. Respiration, 61(5), 282-287. link ↗Guyatt, G. H., Berman, L. B., Townsend, M., Pugsley, S. O., & Chambers, L. W. (1987). A measure of quality of life for clinical trials in chronic lung disease. Thorax, 42(10), 773-778. DOI ↗
別名Nijmegen, Nijmegen Questionnaire, DBQCRQ, Chronic Respiratory Q
関連55
概要The Nijmegen Questionnaire is a 16-item self-report instrument designed to identify dysfunctional breathing patterns, particularly hyperventilation syndrome, in patients presenting with respiratory or non-respiratory symptoms. Developed by van Beveren and colleagues in the Netherlands in 1994, it provides rapid assessment of symptoms attributable to chronic hyperventilation: dizziness, chest tightness, muscle tension, paresthesias, and anxiety. The Nijmegen Questionnaire is widely used in respiratory physiology clinics, pulmonary rehabilitation programs, and psychosomatic medicine to detect dysfunctional breathing phenotypes that may masquerade as asthma, anxiety disorders, or cardiopulmonary disease.The CRQ is a 20-item, four-domain questionnaire developed by Guyatt and colleagues at McMaster University in 1987 to measure health-related quality of life specifically in patients with chronic respiratory disease, particularly chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and cystic fibrosis. Uniquely, the CRQ can be administered by interview or self-report, and its four domains (dyspnea, fatigue, emotional function, mastery) directly address the multidimensional burden of chronic respiratory disease. The CRQ has demonstrated exceptional responsiveness to pulmonary rehabilitation and other interventions, making it a preferred outcome measure in respiratory research and clinical practice.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Nijmegen Questionnaire · CRQ. 2026-06-19に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare