ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

動的マッチング推定量×マッチング推定量×
分野因果推論因果推論
系統Regression modelRegression model
提唱年20101973
提唱者Lechner & Miquel (2010); building on Heckman, Ichimura & Todd (1998)Rubin (1973); large-sample theory by Abadie & Imbens (2006)
種類Nonparametric causal inference / matchingNonparametric matching / causal inference
原典Lechner, M., & Miquel, R. (2010). Identification of the effects of dynamic treatments by sequential conditional independence assumptions. Empirical Economics, 39(1), 111-137. DOI ↗Abadie, A., & Imbens, G. W. (2006). Large Sample Properties of Matching Estimators for Average Treatment Effects. Econometrica, 74(1), 235-267. DOI ↗
別名dynamic treatment matching, sequential matching estimator, dynamic selection-on-observables, DMEnearest-neighbor matching, NNM, matching on covariates, covariate matching
関連66
概要The Dynamic Matching Estimator extends standard matching methods to settings where treatment is assigned sequentially over multiple periods. Instead of a single treatment decision, units receive or forgo treatment at each time point, and the estimator identifies causal effects of entire treatment histories by matching on time-varying covariates and past treatment paths, under sequential conditional independence assumptions.The matching estimator identifies the causal effect of a treatment by pairing each treated unit with one or more untreated units that have similar observed characteristics. Formalised by Rubin (1973) and given rigorous large-sample theory by Abadie and Imbens (2006), it constructs a credible control group from observational data without requiring a parametric model for the outcome.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Dynamic Matching Estimator · Matching Estimator. 2026-06-18に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare