ScholarGate
アシスタント

手法を比較

選択した手法を並べて確認できます。異なる行はハイライト表示されます。

動的アプリケーションセキュリティテスト×シンボリック実行×Taint Analysis(汚染解析)×
分野暗号学暗号学暗号学
系統Machine learningMachine learningMachine learning
提唱年2000s19762005
提唱者Various researchersJames C. KingJames Newsome
種類runtime vulnerability detectionformal verification techniquedata flow tracking technique
原典Kals, S., Kirda, E., Kruegel, C., & Jovanovic, N. (2006). Secubat: A web vulnerability scanner. In Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web (WWW 2006), pp. 247-256. DOI ↗King, J. C. (1976). Symbolic execution and program testing. Communications of the ACM, 19(7), 385-394. DOI ↗Newsome, J., & Song, D. X. (2005). Dynamic taint analysis for automatic detection, analysis, and signature generation of exploits on commodity software. In Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS 2005). link ↗
別名DAST, black-box testing, runtime security testingsymbolic execution, symbolic analysis, concolic executiontaint analysis, information flow, data tainting
関連333
概要Dynamic Application Security Testing (DAST) is a security analysis technique that tests a running application by sending various inputs and observing responses to identify vulnerabilities and security flaws. Developed in the 2000s as a complement to static analysis, DAST exercises the application at runtime, finding vulnerabilities that only manifest during execution such as authentication bypass, insecure redirects, and logic flaws. DAST is commonly used for web application testing and is considered a black-box testing approach since the tester requires no knowledge of internal code structure.Symbolic execution is a program analysis technique that executes programs using symbolic (non-concrete) values instead of actual inputs, tracking how symbolic values flow through the program. Introduced by James C. King in 1976, symbolic execution builds mathematical constraints on program variables and can determine which inputs cause specific program behaviors, enabling automatic test generation and vulnerability detection. Modern symbolic execution tools like KLEE, S2E, and Z3 have become powerful instruments for finding subtle bugs and security vulnerabilities.Taint analysis is a data flow analysis technique that tracks how untrusted (tainted) input flows through a program to identify vulnerabilities where tainted data reaches dangerous operations (sinks). Formalized by Newsome and Song in 2005, taint analysis marks input data as tainted and propagates taint labels through the program, alerting when tainted data reaches sensitive operations like SQL queries or system calls. Taint analysis is fundamental to detecting injection vulnerabilities and is widely used in dynamic analysis tools and security monitoring systems.
ScholarGateデータセット
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED
  1. v1
  2. 2 出典
  3. PUBLISHED

検索へ スライドをダウンロード

ScholarGate手法を比較: Dynamic Application Security Testing · Symbolic Execution · Taint Analysis. 2026-06-17に以下より取得 https://scholargate.app/ja/compare